[Book Summary] Guns, Germs, and Steel--Prologue

[Book Summary] Guns, Germs, and Steel--Prologue

This is my second reading of this fascinating book. I previously read the Chinese version two years ago and summarised it on my blog. Now, I aim to create a more in-depth analysis by writing a summary for each major section: the prologue, 'From Eden to Cajamarca,' 'The Rise and Spread of Food Production,' 'From Food to Guns, Germs, and Steel,' and 'Around the World in Six Chapters.' My goal is to complete these five summaries within the next five to six months

槍砲,病菌與鋼鐵的簡介
最近,我回到了香港,原富(國富論)那本書我留在新加玻,那麼在香港的這段日子,我們一起來看看槍砲,病菌與鋼鐵這本書。 在開場白,作者用一個故事帶出書想解答的問題,我把這本書主要想討論的問題總結如下: 這本書想討論的問題可以用一句話來說:為何財富和權力的分配是以今天這種面貌呈現,而非其他形式,或者,為何各大洲的人文發展速率會有所不同? 在討論這個問題之前,作者首先反駁了一些反對討論這個問題的觀點,有些人認為,討論這個問題是鼓勵一個民族支配另外一個民族,但是解釋一件事情並不代表為它辯護,比如解釋殺人犯為何殺人,不代表一些學者鼓勵殺人;有些人認為,討論這個問題就要用歐洲為本位的歷史觀,吹捧西歐人的業績,本書要討論的是不同民族之間的互動,而不是單單討論歐洲的歷史;有些人會認為討論文明,會令讀者認為文明是好的,高人一等的,狩獵和部落是比較「落後」,作者說,文明是好是壞很難說,他不是要鼓吹某一種社會心態的好處,而只是想了解歷史。 針對這本書的問題,一般有幾種常見的解釋,作者覺得不對,或者是理據不夠充分,他也一一簡單說明,詳細的討論可以在往後的章節中找到。

The book summary will be divided into three parts. The first part will concisely summarize the core argument in one or a few sentences. The second part will highlight the key points and examples presented by the author to support their arguments. Finally, the third part will discuss my personal reflections and connections to the issues raised in the book

The Core Argument

The prologue provides an overview of the book's key question: Why did human development proceed at such different rates on different continents? It also refutes objections to discussing this question and discusses the limitations of existing theories in answering it.

Key Points

  • Discussing the question may appear to justify inequality or dominance. The author points out that there is a difference between explanation and justification. For example, explaining the cause of human diseases does not justify illness.
  • Discussing the question may seem to automatically lead to a Eurocentric approach. The author argues that, on the contrary, the book tries to explain that many basic elements of European civilization were developed by other peoples living elsewhere.
  • Discussing the question may convey the false impression that civilization is inherently good. The author argues that the book does not take a moral stance on civilization but rather tries to explain why some societies developed faster than others.
  • The author refutes the argument that differences in human development are due to genetic differences. He points out that a large group of people believe this theory. One compelling example is the natural experiment in Australia, where European immigrants built a complex civilization within a few centuries, while the Aboriginals, who had lived there for 40,000 years, had not. The author argues that there is no evidence of genetic or IQ differences between ethnic groups when controlling for environmental factors. He also uses his own experience with New Guineans to argue that they are not inferior to Europeans or Americans.
  • Another argument concerns the role of climate in human development. For example, some believe that cold climates stimulate creativity, require more technological innovation for survival, or leave people with more time indoors to invent. The author disagrees and provides examples of societies that developed in warm climates, such as the Maya in Mexico.
  • The author also refutes the argument about the importance of lowland river valleys in dry climates, where highly productive agriculture depended on large-scale irrigation systems that required centralized bureaucracies, such as the Yellow and Yangtze rivers in China. However, detailed archaeological studies show that complex irrigation systems followed the development of bureaucracies with a considerable time lag.
  • Another type of incomplete explanation considers the proximate causes of human development, such as European guns, infectious diseases, steel tools, and manufactured products. The author argues that these are not the ultimate causes of human development.
  • Finally, the author describes the book's organization. Part 1 discusses the history, continental environments, and collision between peoples from different continents from 7 million years ago to the last ice age around 13,000 years ago, and from 13,000 years ago to the present. Parts 2 and 3 discuss the relationship of food, crops, and livestock to the proximate causes of human development, and how the proximate causes link to the ultimate causes. These parts develop the main framework to answer the central question. Part 4 attempts to validate the framework by examining the history of different parts of the world.

Analysis and So What?

  • History is not simply about facts. The importance of this book lies in providing a framework for understanding the history of human development. The practical implication is that this framework may help us better understand the current world.
  • As an average reader, I may not be as concerned with the rate of human development across different continents as the author is. However, when considering the argument on a smaller scale, such as the difference in the rate of development between individuals, I believe that constraints in culture, family, education, resources, information, and opportunities play an important role, in addition to intelligence and hard work. While IQ may play a significant role at the individual level due to its variance in the population, it may not be as influential on a larger scale.
  • The book can also promote a different perspective on the less developed world, instead of focusing on inherent superiority or inferiority. Hopefully, the book can shed some light on improving the situation.

In conclusion, Jared Diamond's "Guns, Germs, and Steel" offers a compelling framework for understanding the disparities in human development across continents. By examining the complex interplay of environmental, cultural, and historical factors, the book challenges simplistic explanations and encourages readers to consider a more nuanced view of human history and its implications for the modern world.